Religion Of One
Student Non-Discrimination Act (H.R. 998 & S. 555)

The religious right have put their own spin on HR998 S555. It seems that preserving a right to choose a sex partner and protecting individuals from discrimination, based upon that choice, are radical actions that promote promiscuity and homosexuality and that homosexual families are anti heterosexual families and that we have a swarm of radical homosexuals in congress who want to indoctrinate children into a homosexual lifestyle.

The religious right view freedom to choose a sex partner as promiscuity and choosing a same sex partner as perverse. They view a same sex family as an enemy of a heterosexual family. They view a legal protection against discrimination and a mandate to encourage tolerance and acceptance of other people’s choices of sex partners and lifestyles and family foundations as an assault against heterosexual choice and lifestyle and family foundation.

Religion businesses spend nearly 400 million dollars each year just to lobby congress. Add in all of the lobbying dollars at state and local and agency levels and the total amount is staggering. So staggering that questions of motive are begged. Motive is visible in rhetoric and legislative activity to promote and protect a heterosexual family foundation and procreation as the sole purpose for having sex. Motive is visible in rhetoric and legislative activity to eliminate abortion and birth control and homosexuality. Add the submissive wife ideal to the elimination of abortion, birth control and homosexuality and the birth rate will increase. With that increase come many more children that religion businesses have access to. With access to many more children, the religion businesses can proselytize and inculcate many more life long customers. With many more children being born, religion businesses can increase revenue from state and federal, faith based programs and subsidized health and human and social and education services and facilities that the religion businesses operate. Put in brief: religion businesses cover their money motive with moral motive and they accuse opposition of what they do.

The following email is demonstrative:

Dear Pro-family American,

The Radical Homosexuals infiltrating the United States Congress have a plan:

Indoctrinate an entire generation of American children with pro-homosexual propaganda and eliminate traditional values from American society.

Their ultimate dream is to create a new America based on sexual promiscuity in which the values you and I cherish are long forgotten.

I hate to admit it, but if they pass the deceptively named “Student Non-Discrimination Act,” (H.R. 998 & S. 555) that’s exactly what they’ll do.

Better named the “Homosexual Classrooms Act,” its chief advocate in Congress is Rep. Jared Polis, himself an open homosexual and radical activist.

And it’s dangerously close to becoming the law of the land.

H.R. 998 already has 157 co-sponsors in the House!

And S. 555 already has 37 co-sponsors in the Senate!

That’s why I need you to act quickly — right away — to protect our nation’s youth.

I have prepared the official “Protect Our Children’s Innocence” Petition to Congress for you to sign.

Please click here to sign it right away so I can rush it to the Capitol with thousands more.

You and I must defeat this disastrous legislation.

You see, the Homosexual Classrooms Act contains a laundry list of anti-family provisions that will:

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so “homosexual students” don’t feel “singled out” during already explicit sex-ed classes;

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to “experiment” with the homosexual “lifestyle;”

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to “freedom of self-expression;”

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a “hostile learning environment” for homosexual students.

And that’s just the beginning of the Homosexual Lobby’s radical agenda.

In fact, it will set them up to ram through their entire perverted vision for a homosexual America.

My friend, I’m sure I don’t have to tell you this is not a fight we can afford to lose.

That’s why Public Advocate is leading the fight against this immoral legislation.

This is a battle for the survival of American values and the fact is, there’s no time to waste.

The Homosexual Classrooms Act will turn America’s schools into indoctrination centers and its classrooms into social laboratories — and they’re pulling out all the stops to pass it.

You see, they’ve disguised the bill’s wicked purpose behind an innocent name: “The Student Non-Discrimination Act.”

The Homosexual Lobby knows that if the public knew the truth about their radical agenda, they’ll have no hope of success.

And their dangerously close to ramming their perversity into law.

H.R. 998 already has 157 co-sponsors in the House!

And S. 555 already has 37 co-sponsors in the Senate!

You and I need to take action right now to stop the growing momentum of this disastrous legislation.

I’ve developed a massive program to launch the second they try to push this bill through — mail, email, phones, and even radio and TV ads.

But that’s only possible with your support…

None of these things are cheap.  In fact, running a program of the size necessary to defeat this bill can get quite expensive especially with increases in postage and printing costs.

That’s why I need your generous contribution.  In addition to your signed “Protect Our Children’s Innocence” Petition, will you contribute $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 right away.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

Unfortunately, this agenda is nothing new.

In fact, other countries like Britain are already experimenting with this kind of legislation, such as mandating public schools inject pro-homosexual content into every aspect of education.

Word problems in math classes are now to include homosexual characters.  History classes will document the “civil rights” struggle against the “oppressive” pro-family establishment.

And it’s even started to infiltrate our state governments.

In California, lawmakers want to “require schools to portray lesbians, homosexuals, transsexuals … as positive role models to children in all public schools.”

Sexual deviants being held up as models of virtue?

If that makes you as sick as it makes me, you simply must join me in this battle for America’s children.

Please sign the “Protect Our Children’s Innocence” Petition to Congress and then send a generous contribution right away.  Your action will make all the difference.

And if all that wasn’t enough to convince you that action must be taken immediately, there’s more.

Many say that there will always be private schools and traditional homeschool families to teach traditional values to the next generation.

But the truth is, this radical agenda is NOT restricted to public schools.

Kevin Jennings, Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” has clearly stated that “every school, public, private or parochial has an obligation” to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum.

In fact, Jennings denounced school choice programs as “very dangerous” because they make it much harder to impose the Homosexual Agenda on our kids.

"Lord forbid a Baptist or Mormon school," he added.

Jennings’ ultimate goal is for all curriculum in “kindergarten, and first grade, and second grade – every grade” be infused with a pro-homosexual slant.

Traditional values will be squashed and demonized as old fashioned or out of date, or even as bigotry.

You and I cannot let them succeed.

Please sign the “Protect Our Children’s Innocence” Petition to Congress I’ve prepared for you right away.

And along with your petition, would you please send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

Thank you so much for all you have done.

Sincerely,

Eugene Delgaudio

President,

Public Advocate of the U.S.

P.S. Radical Homosexuals in Congress have a plan to indoctrinate our children in schools — both public and private.

But Public Advocate is taking a stand.  Will you join me?

Please sign the “Protect Our Children’s Innocence” Petition to Congress I’ve enclosed.

And please, along with your petition, would you please send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 right away?

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

————————————————————————————————————————

Because Public Advocate of the U.S. lobbies against the

Homosexual Lobby, contributions are not tax deductible for IRS purposes.

This email was not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

————————————————————————————————————————

For Information about Advertising, Click Here

www.conservativebyte.com

unsubscribe 

The value of one life is equal to the value of all life. When the value of one life is diminished, the value of all life is diminished.

A person having decisions made for them is a child or a slave. When a state, by force of law, will make an abort birth decision for a female, she is diminished, the value of her life is diminished, all of life is diminished. 

For a right to exist, choice must exist. Remove the right to abort and the right to give birth is forfeit. Birth is now a mandate,…

The value of one life is equal to the value of all life. When the value of one life is diminished, the value of all life is diminished.
Steven Brungard
I Contest House Resolution 609, 2012:

I Contest House Resolution 609, 2012:

Recognizing May 3, 2012, as the “National Day of Prayer” in Pennsylvania.

While this resolution is fast tracked as non controversial, I present serious serious matters that bring the true matter of controversy to light.

Point One: this is an action of state which lends state credibility to a business of religion. Lending state credibility to a religion business is tantamount to respecting an establishment of religion, an act which violates Amendment One of the United States constitution.

Point Two:  not every citizen of Pennsylvania prays to a super natural agent. Roughly fifteen percent of Pennsylvania citizens rely upon themselves and reach within themselves and without to their family members and friends for any additional support or guidance required to meet any situation. To honor these stalwart citizens, we must also hold a national day of non prayer.

Point Three: in the resolution itself, it is stated that “This nation was founded by single-minded men and women who sought wisdom through prayer”. This ignores the founders who did not pray to a super natural agent. These central figures in the founding of our nation, like the stalwart Pennsylvania citizens who rely upon themselves, did not pray for wisdom but earned wisdom and learned wisdom and held it within themselves. We dishonor those founders by disregarding their character, even their being.

House Resolution 609, 2012 is controversial.

House Resolution 609, 2012 violates the constitution of the United States.

Your fellow citizen,

Steven Brungard

1 E Manor Ave Rear

Enola, PA 17025

steve@religion-of-one.org

717-732-7222

PRINTER’S NO.  3176

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

HOUSE RESOLUTION

 

No.

609

Session of

2012

  

INTRODUCED BY CALTAGIRONE, READSHAW, GEORGE, SACCONE, YOUNGBLOOD, AUMENT, BAKER, BENNINGHOFF, BISHOP, BLOOM, BOBACK, BOYD, BROOKS, CAUSER, CLYMER, CONKLIN, CREIGHTON, CUTLER, DeLUCA, DiGIROLAMO, ELLIS, EVERETT, FLECK, GABLER, GEIST, GIBBONS, GINGRICH, GODSHALL, GOODMAN, HAHN, HARHAI, HARRIS, HENNESSEY, HICKERNELL, HORNAMAN, KAUFFMAN, F. KELLER, M. K. KELLER, KILLION, KOTIK, KULA, MAHONEY, MAJOR, MILLARD, MURT, PARKER, PICKETT, ROAE, ROCK, SCAVELLO, SCHRODER, STABACK, STEPHENS, STERN, STEVENSON, SWANGER, TALLMAN, TOEPEL, VEREB, VULAKOVICH, WATERS AND WATSON, MARCH 12, 2012

  

INTRODUCED AS NONCONTROVERSIAL RESOLUTION UNDER RULE 35, MARCH 12, 2012  

  

A RESOLUTION

1

Recognizing May 3, 2012, as the “National Day of Prayer” in

2

Pennsylvania.

3

WHEREAS, The “National Day of Prayer” is a day set aside to

4

pray for this nation; and

5

WHEREAS, The designated day, the first Thursday of May,

6

belongs to all citizens; and

7

WHEREAS, This annual event was not created for political

8

reasons or to promote any other agenda except prayer; and

9

WHEREAS, The “National Day of Prayer” is designed for prayer

10

for leaders, for communities, for families, for children and for

11

one another; and

12

WHEREAS, The “National Day of Prayer” is a day to ask for

13

healing, to heal this nation and to bring people together in

- 1 -

1

true unity; and

2

WHEREAS, Prayer is regarded by millions as the most important

3

utterance for the benefit of humankind; and

4

WHEREAS, This nation was founded by single-minded men and

5

women who sought wisdom through prayer; and

6

WHEREAS, Prayer has aided many people throughout the history

7

of this nation and this Commonwealth when support and guidance

8

were needed; therefore be it

9

RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives recognize May 3,

10

2012, as the “National Day of Prayer” in Pennsylvania.

- 2 -

Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Freedom Center Mongers Sharia Fear

A man dressed up as the prophet Mohammed for a halloween parade in Cumberland County Pennsylvania. A muslim man assaulted the man for insulting islam. The muslim was charged for the assault. The charges were dismissed because the judge understood  what a deep insult it is to dress up, for halloween, as the revered founder of islam.

The judge dressed down the man who wore the costume. I think that was appropriate. I think it was not appropriate to dismiss the charge against the muslim. That person should also have received a dressing down, from the judge, for using violence to express an insult.

This story continues with the Freedom Center using this anecdote and others to monger fear of sharia law trumping the constitution. David Horowitz, the Center’s founder wants people to believe that a major drive is on to have sharia law replace common law. He asks for money to defend the constitution against a widespread threat that exists only in the minds of those who want to create and monger fear of it.

Why do that? Because it helps to cover the fact that christian religion businesses are working to have their dogma replace common law. In several states where anti bullying legislation was presented, christian businesses wanted exemptions for bullying driven by the dogma of christian businesses. In other words, the christian businesses, through their operatives in state legislatures were asking for the same free pass that the Cumber County judge gave to muslim who assaulted a man dressed as the prophet.

For thirty years now, christian religion businesses have been carrying out a silent coup by placing their operatives into every elected, appointed and hired position of local, state and federal government. They intend to run government from the inside. They have already begun to do that and they are having remarkable and frightening success.

Consider the faith based programs that distribute billions of federal dollars each year to christian religion businesses and billions more coming from state coffers and the large number of legislative actions favoring christian businesses. Recently, the christian religion businesses have been emboldened enough to run a major campaign against the reproductive rights and health of females.

Sharia law is not a threat to the constitution. The christian businesses, with their operatives in all levels of government, threaten the constitution that keeps us free from religion. But the threat is deeper than that because their operatives are beginning to run the government from the inside, as planned and openly stated for many years.

For thirty years, catholic and evangelical businesses have been placing operatives into every elected, appointed and hired position of local, state and federal government that becomes available to them. Since the interests of commercial corporations greatly overlap with the interests of religion corporations, they cooperate but quietly. Since the interests of those in government overlap (but not so much as do commercial interests) they also cooperate with the religion businesses.

With the commercial corporations now having virtual control of the economy and with the religion corporations having a very large number of operatives in government positions, the time has come to test the plan: commercial corporations (kings) run the economy, religion corporations (nobles) run the government, the people are placed in pews (serfs). The wealthy? They remain just that.

Will this plan succeed? In the United States live a significant number of people who question everything and stand equal with everyone. They live by their own authority, guided by their own conscience. The constitution makes way for every person to become a sovereign being and conduct themselves in an open and free society: to question everything and stand equal with everyone. Whether the commercial corporations can continue to run the economy and the religion corporations can continue to run the government depends upon the will and the conduct of that segment of society who question everything and stand equal with everyone. Can they defend the constitution that made way for them? Will they succeed?

To grant the exclusion that christian religion businesses pine for is to respect an establishment of that religion businesses above all other religion businesses and above those who are guided by their own conscience. This action would violate Amendments One, Four an Fourteen of our constitution.
Among the inalienable rights that we must preserve for our citizens are the exclusive use of the body which we operate and the use of decision to manage our daily activity and determine our future.
Contraception, male and female, is a decision which manages the daily activity and determines the future. Contraceptive methods involve the exclusive use of the body.

The Public Option will be a safe haven for all persons who want unrestricted access to the reproductive health care and all other health care offered under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The insurance exchange, under PPACA can offer all persons and employers who want religion restricted or moral conviction restricted health care, the choices they seek which align with religious or moral conviction. Have it your way by choosing the Public Health Care Option. Have it your way by choosing an insurer, in the insurance exchange, which excludes what you oppose.

Keep in mind that contraceptives have medical applications as well as family planning and future planning and career planning applications. The medical application of oral contraceptives can mitigate and or prevent acne, breast pain, dysmenorrhea, ovarian cysts, metrorrhagia, mittelschmerz, ovarian and endometrial cancer, premenstrual syndrome, uterine fibroid tumors and iron deficiency anemia. The term “reproductive health care” is far from a misnomer just because oral contraceptives prevent unwanted pregnancy and preclude abortion.

These are my thoughts about this issue:

A petition is collecting signatures and comments from people who want to put reproductive health care beyond the reach of religion businesses. By bringing back the Public Option under PPACA, those who want unrestricted reproductive health care can choose the Public Option. Those who want religion restricted or moral conviction restricted health care can get it their way in the insurance exchange. The religion businesses might still make some objection because tax dollars will be paying for the Public Option, but, the religion and moral conviction restricted policies in the insurance exchange will cost an amount less that equals or exceeds the amount spent for abortion and contraception by the Public Option. Ergo, they are not paying for what they object to. The petition is reported here:

http://www.prleap.com/pr/185480/

and the petition itself is here:

http://signon.org/sign/public-option-amendment?source=c.url&r_by=1518387

The moral motive is being used to cover the money motive that is driving religion businesses so hard. Tabachnik has written a warning, a call to duty for every person who wants to preserve some semblance of gender equality. Religion businesses rely heavily upon children to proselytize and to win government contracts for their charities and human service facilities.

No abortion will add more children. No contraception will add many more children. With children being the primary source of new customers for life and for government contracts, religion businesses will continue to chip away at the first amendment until they get access to more children. Pushing down the inalienable rights of females and poking holes in the wall of separation between church and state is a goal that religion businesses will not cede. 

Tabachnik barely touched upon an invisible coup that has been progressing for nearly thirty years. It is the stated goal of religion businesses to place their operatives in elected, appointed and hired positions in local, state and federal positions so they can run the government from within.

I fought for the right of every citizen to exercise their religion or no religion. I did not fight to enable the christian religion business to violate every female and step upon the rights of all persons as it pokes through the wall of separation and run the government from within . Religion businesses have no compunction against misinforming people and running false flag operations and accusing others of what it is doing nor any compunction against a myriad more tricks and spins, all of which deprives people of their freedom from religion, violates them and does them harm.

Please join me and meet this all too serious threat against the health and well being and freedom and equality of the citizens that I put my life at risk to serve and protect.

The people who brought you “Jesus Camp” are moving into your neighborhood school. And there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.